Advertisement

Customize

200 Things We HATE about PS/SS, First Fifty

« previous entry | next entry »
Sep. 3rd, 2005 | 05:31 pm

This is Part I, the first fifty notes of 200. Parts II through IV are here.

Disclaimer: I am well aware that h8 is not a family value. I also know that hate is disappointed love. I love the Harry Potter books. I would have loved to love the movies, but they sucked. I write this list out of love, not hate.

Though I might rail against Chris Columbus or David Heyman, I have nothing against them personally. I don't know anything about them other than how they present themselves in the public. It's not Chris Columbus, but "Chris Columbus" the director, about whom I speak. Same goes for the actors.

I'm now aware that this list isn't properly citing all its sources. I'm in the process of correcting that. If you have any doubts if something is mine or not, it's best to comment and ask me. (Similarly, if you know where something is from, you can also comment and inform me.)

The inspiration for this list was 78 Reasons to Hate Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menace. As Chefelf did for this list (but not for the sequels, for some reason), I put an asterisk (*) besides the items that we liked instead of hated. Twenty-seven items are starred, so if you want to get technical, this list should be called "173 Things We Hate About and 27 Things We Love About Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (AKA Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone)", but that's not as catchy.

For reference, I am Rebecca, or Redcoast, if you will, the owner of this journal. Isaac is my brother, who likes to collaborate with me and who is, as you will see, crazy.

1. Labyrinth

Of all the images that PS/SS could have begun with, Chris Columbus chose to show an owl sitting atop a “Privet Drive” sign. We pan away and a suspiciously digital-looking owl flies away. It’s extremely dull, and what makes it worse for me is the murky light in which the scene is illuminated.

2. Stupid Music

Dumbledore just appears, as he does in the book (of course, the light is so murky I assumed he was hidden in the fog, not that anything magical had happened). There’s nothing really wrong with this moment except for the stupid music in the background. The music is just amazed by Dumbledore’s little trick. The harp plays, the celeste chimes, the strings go crazy, and I think even a choir jumps in on the action. From now on, when anything happens, assume that overwrought, over-scored music is playing in the background ... making everything SO MUCH WORSE! And this score was written by John Williams. John Williams! Of Star Wars fame? Arrrgh.

3. Albus Dumbledore as portrayed by Richard Harris

Everybody loves Dumbledore. Apparently everybody loves Richard Harris, as well. Whatever. The way Richard Harris chose to portray Dumbledore just doesn’t work for me. He’s too old, too feeble. Too hushed. Too hoarse. Where’s the energy, Richard? Where’s my lively Dumbledore? Then again, Richard Harris did die after filming CoS, so maybe it wasn’t all acting. In that case, it’s Chris Columbus’s fault for casting him.

4. Dumbledore’s Beard

This is a separate point because it isn’t Richard Harris’s fault that his costume, beard, and wig look like they collectively weigh fifty pounds. I mean, look at this:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


I mean, how does he even go to the bathroom? Okay, I squicked myself. Eww.

Yeah, I know JKR said that Dumbledore’s beard is long enough to tuck into his belt.2 JKR is not a costume designer or a hairdresser. She is a writer. She exaggerates. It’s okay to deviate from what she says if it will make the movie better.

5. The Put-Outer

The first thing Dumbledore does–aside from appear out of nowhere and not trip over his enormously long beard–is pull out what looks like a little lightsaber, and suck the light out of the streetlights. This little device is called the Put-Outer. The only thing this accomplishes is that it renders the remainder of the scene so murky and dark I can’t see anything in it. Way to waste time and magic, Dumbledore!

6. The Cat-to-McGonagall Transformation

Dumbledore sees McGonagall in cat form, greets her, and the camera focuses on her shadow as she transforms. Very slowly. Slow transformations make for more impressive special effects, but for lousier powers. No “pop!” and change. Also, as Isaac pointed out, it’s accompanied by the cheesy “Whooosh!” sound effect. Rebecca calls this the, “Look! We have computers!” type of special effects.

7. “Are the rumors true, Albus?”

After greeting each other by their last names, McGonagall and Dumbledore drop the formality and have a half-assed conversation in the dark. At least, McGonagall hisses out a couple of questions while Dumbledore rudely tries to walk away from her. Why does McGonagall even bother to ask about You-Know-Who if all she’s going to say is, “Are the rumors true?” You might want to specify which rumors there, McGonagall. (“No, no, no! He never did anything inappropriate with goats! Those were lies, vicious lies!”1) Then she gets bored talking about the demise of the most evil wizard who ever lived, and moves on to dissing Hagrid. Nice, Minerva. Isaac pointed out that Steve Kloves usually takes out the lines from the book that are funny, witty, or significant, and leaves in everything else.

8. ’Salem’s Lot

This is Rebecca’s thing: ’Salem’s Lot is a novel written by Stephen King, about a small New England town that is invaded by vampires. The thing is, the word “vampire” isn’t used until about three hundred pages into the book. The events get steadily creepier and increasingly out of the realm of the possible, until there is no possibility except vampires to explain the events.

So: why didn’t they do the same thing with PS/SS? I know no one says the word “wizard” till Hagrid tells Harry he’s one, but Dumbledore’s Put-Outer and McGonagall’s cat leave no other possibility.

9. Flying Motorbike

The movie wastes about five minutes on Hagrid’s stupid flying motorbike. And they don’t even mention that it’s Sirius Black’s. Foreshadowing, begone! Ye cannot stay here!

10. Harry the Log Baby

“Try not to wake him,” says Hagrid, as he hands over a log wrapped in baby blankets to Prof. Dumbledore. The sound editor tries to make it look more convincing by adding some baby coos here, even though the log baby is supposed to be asleep. And yeah, they do this in every movie, but it’s still not acceptable.

11. * “Worst sort of Muggles imaginable!”

Dame Maggie Smith is da bomb as Prof. McGonagall. And she looks just like I imagined the character.

12. Hagrid’s Sniffle

Hagrid, instead of bursting into tears, sort of sniffles. Isaac thinks that Robbie Coltrane was absolutely emotionless as Hagrid. Rebecca doesn’t have a problem with it, because she thinks that he was consistent with the character he created. Pick one.

13. Opening Logo

This is Isaac’s thing as well. He thinks the opening title is the height of cheese, what with the stupid music (see #2) and the thunder and lightning and booming and choirooooh-ing and what-not and so-forth.

14. *The title

But Rebecca liked the way the camera zooms through baby Harry’s scar to the sky, reveals the title, and then pulls back from eleven-year-old Harry’s scar. It’s cool, and there’s something about the lighting or the framing or Daniel Radcliffe’s expression that makes him really look like Harry Potter. And they did the noble thing, that is, changed the title from “Philosopher’s Stone” to “Sorcerer’s Stone” in the States. David Heyman, preventer of a thousand confused children prying their clueless parents with questions.

15. *Harry’s Cupboard under the stairs

It’s small, it’s depressing, and Dudley taunts Harry by jumping on the stairs. It’s not too great, I guess, but it’s probably the only thing that’s competently designed in the movie, so it stands out.

16. Harry Melling as Dudley Dursley

“He’s too skinny, he mugs, he shouts, and he doesn’t do his whiney-Dudleyness,” says Isaac. Like Tom Felton, Harry Melling plays Dudley more of a snot-nosed movie bully than a real person. And incidently, the Dursleys are collectively the worst over-actors of the entire Harry Potter series (that is an achievement, my friend).

17. *Harry as Houseboy

Daniel Radcliffe does his best acting when he has the fewest lines. The first scene he has, he is quite effective in. The first time Rebecca saw it, she forgot the dullness of the “Dumbledore on the doorstep” scene and had the highest hopes for the rest of the movie. Hopes that were very slowly and excruciatingly crushed.

18. Harry’s Hair

... is hairy. Ha ha, I made a pun. No, seriously, they spent over a hundred million on this movie and they couldn’t give Daniel Radcliffe the Harry Potter haircut? Instead they gave him a bowl cut, which hides his scar completely and makes his face look round and cute (so that he barely resembles J.K. Rowling’s rather thin-faced, knobbly-kneed, unruly jet-black haired, lightning-bolt-scarred, green-eyed little wizard).

19. From Brazil to Burma

Steve Kloves apparently likes to make bizarre, arbitrary substitutions for his personal amusement. Rebecca would really, really like to know why the Brazilian boa constrictor became a Burmese python.

20. Dan Radcliffe’s Fake Acting

Okay. When the film came out, a lot of reviewers compared Daniel Radcliffe to Jake Lloyd and Haley Joel Osment. That is, that he was better than Jake Lloyd but not as good as Haley Joel Osment. Now, it’s Rebecca’s thing to say that a child actor gets all the credit and none of the blame. If Jake Lloyd was bad, it’s George Lucas’s fault, and if Haley Joel Osment was good, it’s to his credit and not to M. Night Shyamalan’s.

Daniel Radcliffe was fake acting. Blame Chris Columbus.

21. Stupid Vanishing Glass Scene

When Dudley punches Harry in the ribs, Harry gets his revenge by inadvertently removing the glass around the Burmese python’s cage. Only when you watch the movie, it kinda looks like Harry did it on purpose because he spends about five minutes glaring at Dudley from the floor. Dudley, who had been leaning on the glass for no reason, seemingly falls into the snake cage on purpose and watches the snake escape with no fear at all. After the python says “Thankssss” to Harry, the zoo-goers finally notice the huge snake, and react with various levels of staged fear. Only then do the Dursleys (who must’ve nipped out for a drink) realize that their son is trapped inside a zoo exhibit, and (over-)react with a ridiculous amount of fear.

And throughout this scene, Harry goes through a range of stupid expressions to show his emotions. “Surprise!” “Fear!” “Shock!” “Cheesy Grin!” “Trepidation!” “Gulp!”

22. The Editing

... is simply unacceptable.

23. Bizarre scene transition

Uncle Vernon locks Harry into his cupboard as punishment for the vanishing glass incident, and hisses into the grate, “There’s no such thing as magic!” while tinkly, magic music plays. Then suddenly we’re watching an owl deliver a letter. There’s no connection, no emotional context. It’s not even an ironic segue, thanks to the tinkly music. It’s just bizarre and off-putting.

24. *“Ate a funny whelk.”

Uncle Vernon flips over a postcard and exclaims, “Oh, Marge is ill! Ate a funny whelk.” That’s Rebecca’s favorite line of PS/SS. Straight from the book, too!

25. Semi-Retracted [Stupid owls]

Apparently, owls actually aren't stupid; just difficult to train because of their independence. I apologize to any owl who was insulted by my slight to their intelligence. But stupid or not, difficult to train means difficult to shoot. Animals and kids (and animal-like kids) are tough to shoot, period; in making a movie filled with animals and kids, the producers and directors would normally work very hard to trim out anything non-essential. Like the stupid flock of intelligent birdlife that harrass Uncle Vernon. So the important part of this point stands.

[Owls look pretty, but from what Rebecca has heard, they’re incredibly stupid birds and nearly impossible to train. This movie is filled with owls. I know that Steve Kloves doesn’t know anything about bird-training, and it isn’t his responsibility, but somewhere along the line, someone should have stepped up and said, “Gee, owls are really going to be a pain to shoot. Let’s cut down the owl scenes and replace it with something easier, like, say, character development. Then instead of spending our time and insanely huge budget trying to make a tawny owl fly from left to right on cue, we can ensure that the audience will be emotionally connected to the plot.”

I mean, c’mon! When Uncle Vernon leaves for work in the morning, he’s greeted by about twenty owls. It must have been a nightmare to shoot, and it’s not even a good joke. Why make a hard job even harder, guys? Come on!]

26. Toys in the cupboard

Harry has toys in his cupboard. They look like tin soldiers, or really big chess pieces.

27. Fiery face

Uncle Vernon is really hot in this movie. He’s on fire! He’s blazing! He’s sizzling!

No, wait. The editor chose to dissolve from a close-up of a fire burning in a grate to Uncle Vernon’s moustache, creating the illusion of a burning Vernon. Good job, idiot. Rebecca is confiscating your EGA card.

28. *No Post on Sundays.

Maybe Rebecca is going soft, but she liked the “No Post on Sundays.” Maybe it’s because it’s one of the few scenes that has more impact in the movie than in the book.

29. Dan’s voice change

Radcliffe really chose a wrong time to grow up. His voice seems to have changed half-way through the filming of SS. It’s not that noticeable except when his voice is over-dubbed, such as when the letters come streaming out of the chimney, and he protests in his new James Earl Jones voice, “They’re my letters!” If Daniel can’t make his voice sound younger, then they shouldn’t have re-recorded his lines.

30. Hut-On-The-Rock

The Dursleys and Harry take refuge in a really crappy-looking CGI Hut-on-the-Rock. Rebecca misses the toothless guy who loaned them his boat, that would have ruled to see that. Incidentally, though the Hut is supposed to be the nadir of residential architecture, it does have two stories.

31. Slo-o-o-o-ow Entrance by Hagrid

After Harry draws his own birthday cake in the dust, there’s a thundering boom from the doorway. Everyone panics. Dudley and Aunt Petunia whimper their trademark whimpers and Uncle Vernon growls his trademark growl, grasping a rifle. Harry, of course, just stands up, looking fearfully at the door with his innocent, wide eyes. Everyone stands around for approximately five minutes waiting for Robbie Coltraine to smash the door down, which falls over rather like the White King’s sword. Hagrid slooooooowly swaggers into the hut, shadows covering his large Columbus mane, so that he looks like an overgrown lion in a giant sack. The music swells–the Dursleys stare in horror–the camera zooms–the suspense gets bored and takes a smoke break–and the grey light shines on Mr. Emotionless Robbie Coltraine, who says, “Surry abu’e tha’.” I don’t know if this is supposed to be funny, scary, or confusing. And neither do Harry or the Dursleys. They stand there looking awkward and stupid while Hagrid sloooowly replaces the door.

32. *“I’m not Harry!”

Hagrid, who’s a bit slow, mistakes Dudley for Harry. Dudley exclaims, “I’m not Harry!” That’s actually kind of funny because Dudley is played by a guy named Harry. Well, we thought it was funny. It’s an inside joke.

33. Fake Stuttering

Rebecca cannot tolerate three signs of incompetent acting: fake stuttering, fake interruptions, and half-gestures. All three are foreign to every manifestation of real emotions in the human race. No one in real life ever fake-stutters, or fake-interrupts, or swivels their hands about their wrists as if their arms were fastened to their sides. It takes her right out of the movie when any of this happens. And it happens a lot in PS/SS. Daniel Radcliffe and Harry Melling bring us our first serving of fake stuttering when Hagrid appears. “I-I-I’m not H-H-Harry.” “I-I am.” Shut it, y’all.

34. “’Course you know all about Hogwarts.”

Isaac earlier complained that Hagrid shows no emotion. In the book Hagrid assumes that Harry knows he’s a wizard when he finds out that Harry doesn’t know, he shouts the pages off the spine. In the movie, Hagrid growls, “Course, you know all abu’e Hogwar’s.” Harry says lamely, “Sorry. No.” Hagrid leans forward and grunts, “Yer a wiz’rd, ‘Arry. An’ a thumpin’ good one I’ll wager, once ye bin trained up a bi’.” Where’s the fury?

35. *Aunt Petunia’s little speech

Aunt Petunia’s tirade about Harry’s mum is a moment straight from the book that works beautifully. The audience simultaneously learns about Harry’s mum’s background, the soon-to-be very important fact that she was Muggle-born, and gets a glimpse into Petunia’s motivation for abusing Harry. Deep stuff, man. Deep and good.

36. Hagrid’s beard

Chris Columbus strikes again.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Seriously, what is his problem with well-kempt hair?

It must be a real pain to have to wipe the vomit out of that beard. And, like Dumbledore, he adds to his suffocation by wearing heavy winter clothes.

37. Dudley’s tail

... is dumb looking. Also, it’s kind of cruel for Hagrid to attack an innocent bystander, especially a little Muggle kid.

38. “Unless you rather stay, o’ course.”

Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer, Hagrid. Technically, it’s not a question. But it’s still stupid. Say, Harry, do you want to stay with your abusive relatives and go to a crappy public school, or do you want to go off with a giant to a crooked alley, a butterbeer village, and a magical school? Hmmmm.

39. Quirrell’s fake stuttering

Yeah, I know it’s in character for him to pretend to stutter. Still cannot stand it.

40. “I’m not sure I’m exactly the right person to tell you that.”

So says Hagrid after Harry demands to know why everyone (or at least four people) in the Leaky Cauldron knew his name and they all (or at least two of them) wanted to shake his hand. Despite that Hagrid was flaunting Harry the way one might flaunt a Nimbus 2000, or Helga Hufflepuff’s cup, he refuses to explain what happened to Harry. If Robbie Coltrane played it like Hagrid was too much a softie to watch Harry cry, or that he was nervous he would screw such an important exposition scene up, or—you know, if Mr. Emotionless had played it like anything at all, this might make sense, but instead Coltrane dismissively throws the line over his shoulder, like he knows what a piece of crap the script is, and the best thing is to just get it over, and he can’t wait to get out of the Hagrid suit, and now whenever he gets an acting job everyone will be like, “Oh, it’s Hagrid!” despite all the great acting he’s done over the years, so he’ll be darned if he puts any kind of effort into playing a half-giant in a stupid kids’s movie.

Or, to paraphrase:

“See, Harry? Yeh’re famous!”

“But why, Hagrid? All those people in there–how do they all know my name?”

“Oh, go to hell, Harry Potter. Go to friggin’ hell.”

41. Look! We have computers!

And we used them to make a gratuitously fancy entrance to Diagon Alley! “One minute the bricks were brick, and then they were rubber! It was like magic! And then they rearranged themselves with a incongruously realistic scraping sound, and we stood there and grinned our cheesiest grin!”

42. *Extras make the world turn round

... and the Diagon Alley scene a little more bearable, thanks to their dedication and effective acting. Though there are probably too many of them.

43. Diagon Alley

Sigh. The over-wrought Williams score. The boring design. The fact that pretty much all you can see is Hagrid’s back, anyway. The moronic exposition Hagrid spouts. The pain. The boredom.

44. The new Nimbus 2000!

Are the kids in Diagon Alley paid to advertise broomsticks? They exclaim, “Look, it’s the new Nimbus 2000!” And instead of talking about it the way real kids do, they wait until another kid says, “It’s the fastest model yet!” as the camera pans to the end of the stick, where the words “Nimbus 2000" sparkle cheaply. It’s lame and slow and is no better than the useless bats and owls. The film has too many “Gape and Grin” moments and this is one of them.

45. *Gringotts

Kinda goofy-looking, but well designed. And the chandeliers are filthy and covered in cobwebs, which is funny. The Gringotts goblins would have cleaner chandeliers if they supported diversity.

Also, Harry is terrified by the goblins–frightened by their appearance and spooked by Hagrid’s warning about them. Not only is this a nice break from the cheesy grin, it’s a commentary too. Remember the first time you went to a bank? Scary, wasn’t it? The bank was scary, the guards were scary, and the tellers the most frightening of all.

46. The Safest Place There is

From what I can tell, all you need to make a withdrawal from Gringotts is the key to the vault. Harry and Hagrid never show any sort of identification. I would assume that there is some magical process going on that we can’t see, but in the books, the Weasleys often withdraw money from Harry’s account without his knowledge or consent. And in the third book, Sirius Black, an escaped fugitive who should’ve long had his assets frozen, and who is suspected of wanting to kill Harry, uses Harry’s name to withdraw a large amount of gold from his own account. What I’m saying is, in what way is Gringotts the safest place, aside from Hogwarts? (And while we’re on the subject, Hogwarts has had plenty of breaches of its security as well.) Even a Muggle bank is harder to steal from.

47. Goblin fingers

The goblin makeup looks terrific, until we see a close-up of the fingers, which are stiff and unable to bend at the last joint.

48. Griphook & the Lantern

The movie wastes about a minute on Griphook, the goblin who opens Harry’s and the other vaults, saying stuff like, “Lamp, please.” “Key, please.” I know Griphook was played by Verne Troyer, but please. Skip ahead to the important stuff.

49. The grubby little package in Vault 713

The revelation of the contents of Vault 713–a very high-security vault containing a mysterious object–is just stupid. Since it’s just a grubby little package, you could go for comedy here, but Columbus’s camera work and Williams’s dramatic music make it very not funny. In the end, it’s just odd. Oh, stupid, stupid Columbus.

50. *John Hurt

We liked him. And that great little scene where Harry’s wand finds him. The wand chooses the wizard, you know.

Part II here!

Notes:

1. Aberforth, Albus's brother, was accused of using inappropriate charms on a goat. Reference.
2. Or as Roger Ebert put it in his review, "his beard so long that in an Edward Lear poem, birds would nest in it."

Tags: ,

Link | Click to be heard | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {47}

Mindelan

(no subject)

from: [info]draconifers
date: Sep. 4th, 2005 11:51 pm (UTC)
Link

Um...I loved the first movie.

At least it was canon...

I'm sorry, but i really disagree with you on PS.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:22 am (UTC)
Link

Okay, you don't have to disagree with me. I really liked PS the first time I watched it, but on subsequent viewings changed my mind. So I can understand why someone would like it.

But it's not cannon, not at all ... did you mean it was closer to the cannon than PoA?

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mindelan

(no subject)

from: [info]draconifers
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:39 am (UTC)
Link

I've watched it alot of times too, and i still love it...Nothing really gets to me (some exceptions) But do you really hate it?

Very much closer.

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: anonymous
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:45 am (UTC)
Link

Actually, I don't really think that PoA was a great departure from book canon. Different from the other movies, sure, but what I'm trying to point out here is, the Columbus movies were not much like the books either, in terms of tone and mood. Like, the whole school uniforms thing. Yeah, they suddenly change in PoA, but they were designed all wrong in PS/SS and CoS, what with the prep-school inspired ties and plaid skirts.

I really, honestly hate it. Only because I love HP so much, and I think the movie, at the very least, got the franchise off on the wrong foot. But I'm not, like, totally fanatic about all the points listed above. If you or anyone else made a reasonable argument against a point and changed my mind, I'd remove it.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:46 am (UTC)
Link

Shoot, forgot to log in. That anonymous comment is mine.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Mindelan

(no subject)

from: [info]draconifers
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:52 am (UTC)
Link

I would, but i'm wayy tired to right now.

I think PoA was very uncanon to the plot, the characters, and negligent to the magical mood theme. The only good thing i found about it was that it was more mature, darker...

PS was quite canon to the characters, and the plot...I saw not much differed from the book. And there was a magical feeling to it.

Reply | Parent | Thread

s h i n e l

(no subject)

from: [info]diestarcrossed
date: Oct. 8th, 2005 07:35 pm (UTC)
Link

You mean pleated skirts? Since they weren't plaid. I think everyone should realize that in the books THERE ARE NO UNIFORMS other than their outter black robes.

I agree with you that some parts of SS were stupid, but so were parts in CoS, in PoA, and I'm certain there will be TONS in GoF. I hate the movies. The books are much better.

Reply | Parent | Thread

babeie_doll

(no subject)

from: [info]babeie_doll
date: Sep. 4th, 2005 11:53 pm (UTC)
Link

Uh Im not even going to TRY to read this...no...never

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:23 am (UTC)
Link

Fine by me, but thanks for trying. I guess.

Reply | Parent | Thread

michelina marie

LMAO

from: [info]lavitaestbella
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 01:04 am (UTC)
Link

I think I love you. This was awesome, I agree with pretty much all of your points.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

Re: LMAO

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:32 pm (UTC)
Link

Thanks! If it generates enough interest, I might write lists for CoS and PoA ... but they'll have to be shorter. It took like, a week to write this.

Reply | Parent | Thread

 ‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭҉Space Monkey

(no subject)

from: [info]xaznbrattx
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 01:25 am (UTC)
Link

That was hilarious. Those are so true. But I still loved the first movie.

Reply | Thread

Ranjini

(no subject)

from: [info]mish234
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 11:37 am (UTC)
Link

very true, but this is nit-picking, except for some of those glaringly obvious ones.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:34 pm (UTC)
Link

Nit-picking is fun. Give in to the dark side.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:33 pm (UTC)
Link

Thanks.

Reply | Parent | Thread

l-o-l-a

(no subject)

from: [info]rocker007
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 01:34 am (UTC)
Link

tres funny. i agree with most of the things you said, but still prefer ss to poa.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:35 pm (UTC)
Link

How do you feel about CoS? I have this theory that most HP fans love but one movie, and hate the other two.

Reply | Parent | Thread

l-o-l-a

(no subject)

from: [info]rocker007
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 08:29 pm (UTC)
Link

well, i don't like CoS. it's so...pale. like, throughout the whole movie, everyone is a sickly shade. which realy bothers me. but, i like the characters, and (most) of the development.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 09:39 pm (UTC)
Link

what, really? What format do you own the movie in (DVD or VHS)? If you do own the movie?

Reply | Parent | Thread

BugJar

(no subject)

from: [info]bugjar
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 02:28 am (UTC)
Link

Please tell me you've written more of these.
I had to put down my food to not choke with the laughter.
Love all 'round.

Reply | Thread

a

(no subject)

from: [info]simply_inn0cent
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 05:43 am (UTC)
Link

Dude Jake Loyd is the cutest thing like ever. =)

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:36 pm (UTC)
Link

Kid couldn't act, though. I actually feel really sorry for him, stuch with George Lucas as a director, playing ANAKIN SKYWALKER in a STAR WARS film ... I mean, the pressure!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Megan

(no subject)

from: [info]leia131
date: Jan. 27th, 2006 03:32 am (UTC)
Link

Being a big Star Wars fan, and wanting with all my heart to like little Jake, adorable though he may be, he can't act.

It seems to be an Anakin thing. Hayden Christensen is beautiful but he can't act either.

Doesn't mean I don't like the prequels, just means I see the flaws.

I think the same sort of goes for this think you've written here. It's not that you hate Harry Potter or every bit of the movie, but you hate a lot of the things about it.

And I think this is hilarious and I'm going to go read the other 150 parts.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Jan. 27th, 2006 02:33 pm (UTC)
Link

Hayden Christensen is beautiful but he can't act either.

Okay, I take exception to that! But maybe it's just because of how creepy he is in the prequels that stops me from being attracted to him. Which is weird, because the creepy thing is an acting.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Midnight's Shadow

(no subject)

from: [info]phantomwitch
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 06:27 am (UTC)
Link

Well I have to say I agree with you about the costumes being all wrong, but I really loved Richard Harris as Dumbledore. It's a lot better that Michael Gambon, with the long yellowed fingernails. :Shivers: The score was a bit overdone and not nearly mystical enough for what it should have been. They could have done a lot better with their canon-scene interpretations; the put-outer would have been better with the popping noise and the light going out instead of Columbus's musical woosh of light. However, I disliked PoA in that it took the other road of non-canon; over-interpretation. Instead of taking the true events in the book and making them spectacular, Curaon replaced it with what he felt would be more dramatic and exciting. If a middle groud could be found between the two director's styles, that would make the perfect HP film.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:40 pm (UTC)
Link

If a middle groud could be found between the two director's styles, that would make the perfect HP film.

I completely agree; I don't think Newell will find that perfect middle ground. I'm far from a Cuaron hater, because (believe it or not) when I first watch a HP film, I try to completely divorce myself from the book and see the film just as it is. Columbus's movies suck on their own, but Cuaron's film was actually a film.

And, long yellowed fingernails? Never noticed that. He did wear his beard like an upside-down ponytail.

Reply | Parent | Thread

oh....damn

(no subject)

from: [info]sian_punkygal
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 09:14 am (UTC)
Link

i'm not reading that all its obvious you haven't read the books or dont care about them I agree with draconifers It was the most canon its ever going to get :(

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:41 pm (UTC)
Link

No, I have read the books. I've read them a lot. I'm a book fan. "Reading Harry Potter" is, for me, a constant. I've read the entire Lexicon. I've really really read the books.

Reply | Parent | Thread

We are the Empress Jadis

(no subject)

from: [info]mondayschild_
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 12:44 pm (UTC)
Link

I think it's great, really, that the first movie was canon. I don't think anyone who has everything against the uncanon-ness that is PoA & GoF had any clue what the movies were heading for.
But canon isn't the only thing that MAKES a movie. Sure, the characters were carbon copies of what you envisioned them to be like... but the obvious amateur way in which the movie was handled was completely well, blatant. It was so obvious to tell that the directors and producers were treading very lightly and slightly cautious about taking on such a story and bringing it to life on the screen. And you can see how much more confident and advanced the second film is as opposed to the first one, and lets not humor each other with "But that's because it's their second film".
I don't know. The first time I saw PS, I was very very disappointed. The effects and the music were terrible, and I didn't like Richard Harris much either.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 04:43 pm (UTC)
Link

I always get so confused when someone says the first movie was "cannon." But I agree, and thanks for stopping by.

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]sofoxy_
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 06:03 pm (UTC)
Link

I'm apparently the only one to think John Williams composed brilliant music then :(

Reply | Thread

Loren [No one will love what you love to defend]

(no subject)

from: [info]wesparkandfade
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 08:52 pm (UTC)
Link

Well, I thought it was a bit odd that you'd even post this, seeing as it has nothing to do with Emma. I know the second part will, but you probably should have posted it instead. I disagree with all of your points, and I think Rebecca needs to do some research on owls because owls in fact are quite clever, not stupid. They're more independant until they find a mate, and then are very loyal. That could be why they're hard to train, not because they're thick. I think that you and your brother, and your friend or whatever need to get your facts straight before you make assumptions. But yes, it is your opinion but I cannot say I agree with them, and I skipped arond a lot because it was quite stupid to put a review about PS without any Emma in it, on an Anti Emma Community.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 09:37 pm (UTC)
Link

Emma doesn't enter the movie until I get to #65. Now, where was it that I read that owls are stupid? Well, it doesn't really matter to me, because my point was that since owls are difficult to train and shoot, they shouldn't have filled the movie with them.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 5th, 2005 09:38 pm (UTC)
Link

Williams's music is generally very good; it just doesn't work in this film. It sounded a whole lot better on album, leading me to think that he was overreaching or trying too hard, if you know what I mean.

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]omgaw
date: Sep. 6th, 2005 09:39 pm (UTC)
Link

39. Quirrell’s fake stuttering

Yeah, I know it’s in character for him to pretend to stutter. Still cannot stand it.


As a person who actually does stutter, I found that he stuttered WAY too much. It was like every other word. And I cringed each time he did it.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 6th, 2005 11:33 pm (UTC)
Link

I have a speech impediment as well; I think that's why I hate fake stuttering so much.

Reply | Parent | Thread

susannaalice

hey

from: [info]susannaalice
date: Sep. 7th, 2005 10:12 pm (UTC)
Link

um I still won't use live journal but wanted to say that you're flourishing on here girl! look at the popularity of your little shannigan here (btw I have no idea how to spell shannigan) well must be going now!

Reply | Thread

Katie

(no subject)

from: [info]sporkgoddess
date: Sep. 11th, 2005 02:36 pm (UTC)
Link

Ooooh, this list is AWESOME! I could not agree more... especially aboutthe music. God I hate the Harry Potter music. I hate how they try to make the movies so creepy and cold... that's for #5+, guys!

I never noticed Coltrane's lack of acting. I'll have to pay close attention in movie four, methinks.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Sep. 11th, 2005 07:30 pm (UTC)
Link

Huh ... I would say that the music was going for Dramatic with a capital-D rather than creepy/cold. Dislike of Coltrane is strictly my brother's thing. I'll say this for Coltrane: he doesn't overact. But he doesn't really put his back into it, either. Hagrid's obsessive love of animals has gone the same way as Wood's obsessive love of Quidditch.

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]ex_jacomus91
date: Dec. 8th, 2005 01:54 am (UTC)
Link

Terrific post!

I'd have to say I completely agree with you on most points - although his beard and costume was stupid, I liked Richard Harris as Dumbledore (it was if he was plucked from my the image I had of him in my head) as opposed to Michael Gambon - but I don't think Gambon is to be blamed for his portrayl of Dumbledore either.

Also, I just saw Goblet of Fire when it was released last week here, and I'd have to say that Robbie Coltrane's performance in this one was his worst yet as Hagrid - the others were bareable. :D

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Dec. 8th, 2005 05:39 am (UTC)
Link

Hooray, another Robbie Coltrane hater! As for Richard Harris, well, he looked a lot like my mental image of Dumbledore, but he didn't act it. I've always imagined Dumbledore acting ... well, younger.

How'd'you like Michael Gambon's "human" take on Dumbledore in GoF? I thought it made him look like an idiot.

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]ex_jacomus91
date: Dec. 9th, 2005 11:27 pm (UTC)
Link

Yes, of all things, Dumbledore never loses his cool and shouts at Harry and shakes him violently like a fkn idiot. He was too on-edge and I thought that the only scenes that were anywhere near accurate were the one where he busts in on Harry and Moody!Crouch Jr and the little scene in the dorms at the end. I miss the 'Dumbledore Explains It All' scene and the funeral was weak as - I mean, wtf? Why was Draco upset?

Reply | Parent | Thread

fin

(no subject)

from: [info]lessthangreat
date: Jan. 3rd, 2006 02:27 am (UTC)
Link

This is wonderful. I completely agree with you. I have a personal theory that every Harry Potter movie makes the one that came out before it look so, so, soooooo bad. Except for CoS, which in my opinion, had no affect on SS whatsoever, but was still worse. I'm already starting to twitch about the 4th movie so I can't wait to see how much the 5th one makes me hate GoF.

Anyway, point is, this is great, I am totally with you, boo Chris Columbus, oh happy day.

Reply | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Jan. 15th, 2006 05:08 pm (UTC)
Link

I'd agree with your theory, but I still like PoA better than GoF. Boo Chris Columbus! Boo!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Megan

(no subject)

from: [info]leia131
date: Jan. 27th, 2006 03:40 am (UTC)
Link

Love this. Going to read the rest of it, but first I have a suggestion for you:

The woman who writes movies in 15 minutes has a little disclaimer that politely asks people not to tell her that she hated the movies she's parodying, because she did not in fact. Maybe you could put something at the beginning of this making it clear that you have read the books and in fact like Harry Potter (if not the movies) to save yourself the trouble of having to constantly defend yourself against accusations of hating Harry Potter in general. (Run on sentence like WOAH. Heh. Sorry.)

Just a thought. :)

Reply | Thread

Megan

(no subject)

from: [info]leia131
date: Jan. 27th, 2006 03:42 am (UTC)
Link

And wow, I just found this and it was posted like four months ago... hope you get the comments anyway!

:)

Reply | Parent | Thread

Sex and a dog-eared paperback dictionary

(no subject)

from: [info]redcoast
date: Jan. 27th, 2006 02:38 pm (UTC)
Link

Oh, I occasionally still get comments on this piece. I'm not sure where they come from, one of the comms maybe. I like your suggestion to add a disclaimer ... maybe I'll do it, when I have time to edit this thing.

Icon love!

Reply | Parent | Thread

Advertisement

Customize